Service Enhancements
Documentation

Have something to say?

Tell Ultra.cc how they could make the service more useful to you.

All posts are moderated, so please don't double-post if it takes a while for your post to appear. Check if your application request already exists, and if it does, you can place a vote instead.

Completed

Apps installed using the command line do not show up in CP

As per title, using something like app-qui install in the command line leads to the app not popping up in the WebUI. My situation is as follows: the graphical installer for qui failed without an error for me and it didn’t output any troubleshooting information. I decided to try the command line. The command line worked without issue, and now I’m stuck with qui not popping up in the command line. I am aware https://feedback.ultra.cc/p/bug-version-number-of-installed-apps-different-when-updated-via is a thing, but this seems to be a slightly different/more severe issue, since you may or may not have error checking for this and this may corrupt the app state if the GUI installer is not aware of the installation. Also, since the CLI is known to be funky, would it be possible to at least add a: echo “Installing/updating programs using CLI may cause issues with the WebUI” to the script, or to --help ?

theno About 11 hours ago

1

🐛 Bug Reports

cross-seed conflicts with The Lounge installation

Following the instructions listed on https://docs.ultra.cc/community/cross-seed while The Lounge is installed leads to a broken cross-seed installation. Investigating closer, it seems to be due to that both write a node-related variable into .bashrc, which leads cross-seed to use The Lounge’s copy of node. This causes a versioning conflict with one of cross-seed’s dependencies. I’m not sure what the consequences would be of installing cross-seed first and then installing The Lounge, but I presume it wouldn’t be good. Though I realize the cross-seed installer is not officially supported and this probably won’t be fixed, could we at least put a specific disclaimer about this in the install guide?

theno About 11 hours ago

1

🐛 Bug Reports

Consider adding Transmission 4.1.1 to #beta

Dear team, I’d appreciate if you could consider adding Transmission 4.1.1 as beta so we could start testing this new release. As per https://github.com/transmission/transmission/releases/ there are several nasty bugs once present in 4.1.0 stable - most of them preventing us from using 4.1.0 in our boxes - that are now fixed. Considering also the fact Transmission 4.0.5 is more than two years old now, that would be, IMHO, a great path forward. Cheers.

tuliolazarini 3 days ago

💡 Feature Request

ReadMeABook - The Audiobook Overseer for Plex and AudioBookShelf!

This tool I have been testing for a little while. It works like Overseerr but for AudioBookShelf - Integrating to Prowlarr and Torrent client to request, search, download, index and add to AudioBookShelf. This application would be so great to have on my server. Or even given the ability to add it as an “unnofficial” installer as it is very straight forward to do the docker. https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/1pcnqst/readmeabook_audiobook_library_manager_request/

DeeDubs About 1 month ago

1

💡 Feature Request

Podman

Since we cannot use Docker due to it needing access to root, how about making accessible Podman? It’s built around running containers in userspace environments, storing containers and images in ~/.local/share Since it’s designed to be contained in userspace, it should work well in our multi user environments. And of course, users shouldn’t have access to other users’ containers with Podman. This should allow us to be able to start applications via containers, and greatly expand the number of available applications, and reduce the complexity of installing them.

linkion About 1 month ago

💡 Feature Request

Tailscale - Custom Control Server Option

I run my own Headscale deployment and would like to use the Tailscale app on USBX with it. You just need to add an option to the existing Tailscale app to accommodate: tailscale login --login-server= https://tailscale.com/kb/1507/custom-control-server I am imagining something like an extra argument for the existing installation command (where is passed to the above internal Tailscale structure as required): app-tailscale install -s -p Could we please get this option? I don’t imagine it would have extensive development time attached.

An Anonymous User About 1 month ago

💡 Feature Request