Service Enhancements
Documentation

Have something to say?

Tell Ultra.cc how they could make the service more useful to you.

All posts are moderated, so please don't double-post if it takes a while for your post to appear. Check if your application request already exists, and if it does, you can place a vote instead.

Consider adding Transmission 4.1.1 to #beta

Dear team, I’d appreciate if you could consider adding Transmission 4.1.1 as beta so we could start testing this new release. As per https://github.com/transmission/transmission/releases/ there are several nasty bugs once present in 4.1.0 stable - most of them preventing us from using 4.1.0 in our boxes - that are now fixed. Considering also the fact Transmission 4.0.5 is more than two years old now, that would be, IMHO, a great path forward. Cheers.

tuliolazarini About 3 hours ago

💡 Feature Request

ReadMeABook - The Audiobook Overseer for Plex and AudioBookShelf!

This tool I have been testing for a little while. It works like Overseerr but for AudioBookShelf - Integrating to Prowlarr and Torrent client to request, search, download, index and add to AudioBookShelf. This application would be so great to have on my server. Or even given the ability to add it as an “unnofficial” installer as it is very straight forward to do the docker. https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/1pcnqst/readmeabook_audiobook_library_manager_request/

DeeDubs About 1 month ago

1

💡 Feature Request

Podman

Since we cannot use Docker due to it needing access to root, how about making accessible Podman? It’s built around running containers in userspace environments, storing containers and images in ~/.local/share Since it’s designed to be contained in userspace, it should work well in our multi user environments. And of course, users shouldn’t have access to other users’ containers with Podman. This should allow us to be able to start applications via containers, and greatly expand the number of available applications, and reduce the complexity of installing them.

linkion About 1 month ago

💡 Feature Request

Tailscale - Custom Control Server Option

I run my own Headscale deployment and would like to use the Tailscale app on USBX with it. You just need to add an option to the existing Tailscale app to accommodate: tailscale login --login-server= https://tailscale.com/kb/1507/custom-control-server I am imagining something like an extra argument for the existing installation command (where is passed to the above internal Tailscale structure as required): app-tailscale install -s -p Could we please get this option? I don’t imagine it would have extensive development time attached.

An Anonymous User About 1 month ago

💡 Feature Request