Service Enhancements
Documentation

Have something to say?

Tell Ultra.cc how they could make the service more useful to you.

All posts are moderated, so please don't double-post if it takes a while for your post to appear. Check if your application request already exists, and if it does, you can place a vote instead.

archivebox.io

https://archivebox.io/ ArchiveBox is a self-hosted app that lets you preserve content from websites in a variety of formats. We aim to make your data immediately useful, and kept in formats that other programs can read directly. As output, we save standard HTML, PNG, PDF, TXT, JSON, WARC, SQLite, all guaranteed to be readable for decades to come. ArchiveBox also has a CLI, REST API, and webhooks so you can set up integrations with other services. Without active preservation effort, everything on the internet eventually disappears or degrades. ArchiveBox is an open source tool that lets organizations & individuals archive both public & private web content while retaining control over their data. It can be used to save copies of bookmarks, preserve evidence for legal cases, backup photos from FB/Insta/Flickr or media from YT/Soundcloud/etc., save research papers, and more…

oops About 9 hours ago

💡 Feature Request

Planned

Availability of qBittorrent 5.1.4

We can all agree that it is to keep applications up to date for security and bug fixes, features etc, and for the security of the servers and users as a whole. I am on version 5.0.3 which was the latest release version available. I would therefore request an app “repair and upgrade” option for qBittorrent as per other available apps, and in any case an upgrade option to 5.1.4. Thanks.

An Anonymous User 13 days ago

1

💡 Feature Request

Rejected

BTRFS or XFS volumes for improved cross-seed support

Most UCC seedboxes are formatted with ext3, to support more efficient cross-seeding, could you please consider provisioning new hosts or new volumes formatted with either XFS or BTRFS file system? This would allow Reflink to be used for copy-on-write cross seeding, making storage consumption more efficient.

An Anonymous User 19 days ago

1

💡 Feature Request

Completed

Apps installed using the command line do not show up in CP

As per title, using something like app-qui install in the command line leads to the app not popping up in the WebUI. My situation is as follows: the graphical installer for qui failed without an error for me and it didn’t output any troubleshooting information. I decided to try the command line. The command line worked without issue, and now I’m stuck with qui not popping up in the command line. I am aware https://feedback.ultra.cc/p/bug-version-number-of-installed-apps-different-when-updated-via is a thing, but this seems to be a slightly different/more severe issue, since you may or may not have error checking for this and this may corrupt the app state if the GUI installer is not aware of the installation. Also, since the CLI is known to be funky, would it be possible to at least add a: echo “Installing/updating programs using CLI may cause issues with the WebUI” to the script, or to --help ?

theno About 1 month ago

1

🐛 Bug Reports

Completed

cross-seed conflicts with The Lounge installation

Following the instructions listed on https://docs.ultra.cc/community/cross-seed while The Lounge is installed leads to a broken cross-seed installation. Investigating closer, it seems to be due to that both write a node-related variable into .bashrc, which leads cross-seed to use The Lounge’s copy of node. This causes a versioning conflict with one of cross-seed’s dependencies. I’m not sure what the consequences would be of installing cross-seed first and then installing The Lounge, but I presume it wouldn’t be good. Though I realize the cross-seed installer is not officially supported and this probably won’t be fixed, could we at least put a specific disclaimer about this in the install guide?

theno About 1 month ago

2

🐛 Bug Reports

Consider adding Transmission 4.1.1 to #beta

Dear team, I’d appreciate if you could consider adding Transmission 4.1.1 as beta so we could start testing this new release. As per https://github.com/transmission/transmission/releases/ there are several nasty bugs once present in 4.1.0 stable - most of them preventing us from using 4.1.0 in our boxes - that are now fixed. Considering also the fact Transmission 4.0.5 is more than two years old now, that would be, IMHO, a great path forward. Cheers.

tuliolazarini About 1 month ago

1

💡 Feature Request